Maxime Chazal vs Nathan Seateun Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chazal vs Seateun analysis and find out who is favored!
Maxime Chazal vs Nathan Seateun Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chazal 1 - 0 Seateun
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chazal has won 45.05% of points on his second serve, while Seateun has won 44.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chazal, in recent form, has won 51.56% of his opponent's second serve points, while Seateun has won 48.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.63% and 37.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chazal has saved 63.39% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Seateun has saved 52.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chazal has won 54.17% of matches played (W/L 26/ 22), with Seateun winning 47.62% (W/L 10/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chazal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 409/ 242), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12). Seateun has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 96/ 79), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 38/ 37).
- Player level: In the last year, Chazal has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 22/ 12), where as Seateun has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 10/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chazal winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chazal winning 2 and Seateun winning 0. The last match between Chazal and Seateun was at the M25 Bourg-en-Bresse, 29-06-2023, Second, Clay with Maxime Chazal getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chazal and Seateun have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chazal winning 0 times and Seateun 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chazal winning 0, and Seateun 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chazal has played against opponents with an average rank of 211.35 while Seateun has played against players with an average rank of 134.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chazal has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Seateun has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chazal has converted 48.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Seateun has converted 44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
12
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
12
Minor
561
Rank
234
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
891
Rank
666
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
60% (445-293)
Career Total W/L
53% (146-128)
52% (11-10)
YTD W/L
57% (4-3)
$2,860
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Maxime Chazal | Nathan Seateun |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:23:0 | 1:23:0 |
1st Serve % | 67% (30/45) | 65% (28/43) |
1st Serve Win% | 87% (26/30) | 54% (15/28) |
2nd Serve Win% | 67% (10/15) | 40% (6/15) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 0% (0/2) |
Return Points W% | 51% (22/43) | 20% (9/45) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-2 |
Maxime Chazal
Player
Nathan Seateun
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Maxime Chazal | Nathan Seateun |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 52% (11/10) | 57% (4/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 54% (26/22) | 50% (8/8) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (234/229) | 51% (77/75) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 50% (1/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 60% (3/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.15 |
Aces Total | 33 | 11 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.12 |
DFs Total | 53 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 2:2:4 | 1:25:8 |
Avg Opp Rank | 155.86 | 65 |
1st Serve % | 63% (977/1543) | 65% (235/361) |
1st Serve W% | 67% (657/977) | 64% (151/235) |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (255/566) | 50% (63/126) |
BPs Won% Total | 49% (68/140) | 42% (18/43) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (596/1443) | 43% (167/391) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 69% (11/5) | 57% (4/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (11/20) | 57% (4/7) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 33% (1/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, W | 71% (14/10) | 100% (3/3) |
1st set W, L | 29% (14/4) | 0% (3/0) |
1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 25% (4/1) |
Maxime Chazal Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Maxime Chazal
Player
Simon Beaupain
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
76 of
110)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
50 of
76)
44%
(
21 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
110)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Taro Daniel
Player
Maxime Chazal
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Martin Krumich
Player
Maxime Chazal
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Maxime Chazal
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maxime Chazal
Player
Jasza Szajrych
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maxime Chazal
Player
Noah Perfetti
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Maxime Chazal
Player
Neil Oberleitner
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Maxime Chazal
Player
Milos Karol
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Maxime Chazal
Player
Pietro Marino
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maxime Chazal
Player
Michael Gloeckler
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
43 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Nathan Seateun Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
QF |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Nathan Seateun
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nathan Seateun
Player
Marlon Vankan
69%
(
76 of
110)
1st Serve %
76%
(
87 of
114)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
53 of
87)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
114)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nathan Seateun
Player
Lucas Bouquet
68%
(
67 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Toufik Sahtali
Player
Nathan Seateun
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nathan Seateun
Player
Aymeric Bourne
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Nathan Seateun
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more